Due to plunging stocks and dips in national housing prices, I think I should dedicate at least a blog post to how the current economic crisis affects buying in Pittsburgh. Although it is difficult for me to recommend spending money right now, I feel that the Pittsburgh market has been relatively shielded from the rest of the country. As illustrated in my newsletter, a comparison between the US vs Pittsburgh market shows that Pittsburgh never experienced the boom of the early 90′s and 2000′s.
Recent numbers show that the Pittsburgh market is still not dropping in price. Not only has it proven itself to be historically stable,the Pittsburgh real estate market seems to be extremely stable in terms of the cost/rent ratio as mentioned by David Leonhardt. The reason his ratio is important is because historical stability is almost meaningless in the short term (it is also rather poor at predicting the future). For example, the stock market has historically returned on average 8-10% a year since the early 1900′s. However, most investors who began investing the late 1990′s (right before the bursting the tech bubble) will find that their yearly portfolio returns are in the negatives. The moral of the story is: don’t base current assumptions on history, for history repeats itself only in hindsight, which is always 20/20. Leonhardt’s ratio is a current estimate rather than one based upon history. He compares the prices of rent and buying, assuming that the two will compete with each other if one’s prices gets too high. This allows a sort of checks and balances on buying, something prone to speculation, to renting.
Let’s look at a typical South Oakland home. I will use South Oakland as an example because I have visited many properties for rent in the area from visited friends who live there. A typical 4 bedroom housing would go for rent for about $1,000 a month, a very conservative estimate for rent. This means that over the course of 1 year, the duration of a typical lease. The total rent adds up to almost $12,000 a year. Although this seems like a lot, remember that a 3 people sharing a housing would each pay $250 for their own bedroom. For people familiar with South Oakland housing prices, very few houses that cost $1,000 a month will come close to a $150,000 asking price (let alone the sales price). Even with extremely conservative estimates, the buy/rent ratio of the home is 12.5 (150,000/12,000), below Leonhardt’s set number of 15. An important aspect of using the ratio is that it is not suited to condominiums. Due to condo fees and the fact that condo owners don’t own property, condominium are always priced lower than rent/buy would typically suggest.
Finally, I would like to end it with my favourite quote from Warren Buffett. “Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.” I want to get this point across. The Pittsburgh housing market is stable enough that you should at least take a chance on it if you have enough funds. Everyone is running scared about buying, which hopefully will mean that you are buying below market value*. It is far better to put your money into a home or an IRA account than spending it on a rapidly depreciating asset (cars, HDTVs, large amounts of alcohol etc…)
*Neither Buffet nor I endorse market-timing, hence the use of hope. I believe that the buy/rent ratio reflects the intrinsic value of Pittsburgh’s real estate market. However, I make no promises.






